The Rise of Quiet Quitting and Work/Life Boundaries in Tech

The technology sector, once synonymous with ping-pong tables, free dinners, and the glorification of “sleeping under the desk” to meet a launch deadline, is undergoing a profound cultural shift. For decades, the implicit contract in tech was simple: give your life to the company, and in return, receive high salaries, stock options, and the prestige of changing the world. However, following the global shifts of the 2020s, a wave of economic instability, and widespread layoffs, that contract has fractured. Enter “quiet quitting”—a misnomer that doesn’t mean leaving a job, but rather rejecting the idea that work should be the central focus of one’s life.

In this deep dive, we explore quiet quitting in tech, analyzing why it has become a survival mechanism for many, how it relates to healthy work/life boundaries, and what it signals for the future of the industry.

Key Takeaways

Definition: Quiet quitting is not about laziness; it is about fulfilling your job description exactly as written without performing unpaid, extra labor.
The Driver: In tech, this trend is a direct response to burnout, “crunch culture,” and the realization that loyalty does not protect against layoffs.
The Shift: There is a move away from “hustle culture” toward “sustainable pace,” valuing longevity over short-term intensity.
The Risk: While setting boundaries is healthy, passive-aggressive disengagement can stall career growth if not communicated effectively.
The Future: Companies must adapt by measuring output rather than hours and respecting the “right to disconnect.”

Who this is for (and who it isn’t)

This guide is for:

Tech Professionals: Software engineers, product managers, designers, and data scientists feeling the weight of burnout or questioning the return on their “extra mile” efforts.
Team Leaders & Managers: Those noticing a shift in team energy and looking to understand the root causes of disengagement versus boundary-setting.
HR & Culture Ops: Professionals trying to retain talent in a post-hustle economy.

This guide isn’t for:

Those seeking legal employment advice: While we discuss contracts and expectations, this is a cultural analysis, not legal counsel.
Proponents of “Grindset”: If you believe 80-hour weeks are the only path to success, this analysis of work-life balance may not align with your philosophy.

What “Quiet Quitting” Actually Means in the Tech Context

To understand the phenomenon, we must first strip away the negative connotation often applied by skeptical media outlets. “Quiet quitting” is effectively a rebranding of an old labor concept: work-to-rule. It involves doing exactly what your job requires—no more, no less.

In the technology sector, where scope creep is rampant and “wearing many hats” is often a badge of honor, quiet quitting looks like a radical act of rebellion.

The Core Behaviors

In practice, quiet quitting in tech manifests as:

Closing the Laptop at 5:00 PM: Rejecting the expectation to be available on Slack or email during evenings and weekends.
Declining “Voluntold” Tasks: Refusing to join culture committees, plan offsites, or mentor juniors if these tasks are not part of the core role or compensated.
Ignoring Non-Urgent Pings: treating asynchronous communication as truly asynchronous, rather than responding instantly to every notification.
Using Full PTO: Taking all allocated vacation and sick days without guilt or checking in.

It Is Not “Quitting”

The term is misleading because the employee has no intention of resigning. They are often high-performing individuals who have decided that their mental health is more valuable than a potential promotion or a discretionary bonus. They are “quitting” the idea of going above and beyond for free.

The Death of the “Hustle Culture” Narrative

For years, Silicon Valley exported a specific narrative: if you love what you do, it isn’t work. This “passion tax” allowed companies to extract excessive labor from employees under the guise of mission-driven work. Startups equated long hours with dedication, and established tech giants created campuses designed to keep you there as long as possible (free food, gyms, nap pods).

Why the Narrative Collapsed

Several factors contributed to the erosion of hustle culture:

The Pandemic Epiphany: When the world moved to remote work, the perks of the office disappeared. Without the free sushi and the game rooms, tech jobs were revealed for what they fundamentally are: an exchange of labor for money. This clarity allowed workers to reassess the role of work in their lives.
The Broken Promise of Equity: In the past, the grind was justified by the lottery ticket of stock options. However, as of early 2026, market corrections and varying valuations have left many options underwater. When the financial upside of “hustle” evaporates, the motivation to overwork vanishes with it.
Layoffs and Loyalty: The massive layoff cycles of 2023 and 2024 shattered the illusion of the “work family.” Employees saw high performers let go via email after years of 60-hour weeks. The lesson learned was stark: the company will not love you back.

The Psychological Contract: Why Tech Workers Are Pulling Back

Every employment relationship is governed by a “psychological contract”—the unwritten set of expectations between employer and employee. In tech, this contract used to be: “You give us your all, and we give you security, wealth, and status.”

The Breach of Trust

When companies began demanding Return to Office (RTO) mandates despite record productivity during remote periods, many workers felt betrayed. The flexibility they had structured their lives around was being revoked, often without data-backed justification.

This breach of the psychological contract is a primary driver of quiet quitting in tech. If the employer changes the terms (e.g., forcing relocation or increasing hours without increasing pay), the employee creates a new internal boundary to protect themselves. Quiet quitting is, in many ways, a defense mechanism against an environment perceived as exploitative or unstable.

“Acting Your Wage”

A subset of this trend is the concept of “acting your wage.” In tech, where pay disparities can be massive, employees are increasingly calibrating their effort to their compensation. A mid-level developer may refuse to take on the architectural responsibilities of a Staff Engineer without a corresponding title change and raise. This is a return to transactional clarity: labor is a commodity, and you get what you pay for.

Recognizing the Signs: Boundary Setting vs. Burnout vs. Disengagement

It is crucial to distinguish between a healthy employee setting boundaries and an employee who is burnt out or actively disengaged. While they may look similar on the surface (reduced output), the internal drivers and solutions are different.

1. Healthy Boundary Setting

This employee is engaged, productive, and reliable during working hours. They meet deadlines and communicate well. However, they are unreachable after hours and do not volunteer for extra work.

Manager Action: Respect their limits. This is a sustainable employee who will likely stay long-term.

2. Burnout

This employee wants to care but physically or emotionally cannot. They may be cynical, exhausted, or making uncharacteristic errors. Their “quiet quitting” is a cry for help or a recovery period.

Manager Action: Intervention is needed. Reduce workload, encourage time off, and check in on their well-being.

3. Active Disengagement

This employee is doing the bare minimum to avoid getting fired, but the quality of their work is suffering. They may be “coasting” or working a second job on company time. They are often negative and drain team morale.

Manager Action: Performance management. This requires clear feedback and structured improvement plans.

Feature	Healthy Boundaries	Burnout	Active Disengagement
Work Quality	High / Consistent	Declining / Inconsistent	Bare Minimum / Poor
Communication	Clear / Professional	Withdrawn / Cynical	Avoidant / Ghosting
Availability	Available during hours	Spotty / Unpredictable	Hard to reach always
Motivation	Professional pride	Depleted	Gone

Establishing Healthy Boundaries Without Sabotaging Your Career

For tech workers who want to reclaim their time without being labeled a “slacker” or risking their job security, the key is communication and visibility. Quiet quitting does not have to be silent; sometimes, “loud boundaries” are safer.

1. The Art of the “No”

Saying no to requests is terrifying for high achievers. However, a strategic “no” protects the quality of your “yes.”

The Strategy: Instead of a flat refusal, frame it as a prioritization choice.
The Script: “I’d love to help with Project X, but taking that on would jeopardize the deadline for Project Y. Which one should I prioritize this sprint?”

2. Visible Asynchronous Work

If you are working remotely, anxiety often drives people to be “always green” on Slack. To quiet quit effectively, you must decouple presence from productivity.

The Strategy: Over-communicate status updates. Post a daily stand-up summary of what you accomplished. If people see your output, they obsess less over your green dot.

3. Ritualizing the Shutdown

In tech, the lines between work and life blur, especially with smartphones.

The Strategy: Create a physical or digital ritual to end the day. Close the laptop and put it in a drawer. Turn off notifications on your phone at a specific time. Use “Focus Modes” on devices to block work apps after 6:00 PM.

4. Managing On-Call Rotations

On-call duties are a major source of burnout in DevOps and engineering.

The Strategy: Advocate for strict compensation or “comp time” (time off in lieu) for on-call hours. If you are woken up at 3:00 AM, ensure the team culture supports you starting late or taking the next day off.

The Remote Work Paradox: Flexibility vs. Always-On

Remote work was supposed to improve work-life balance, but for many in tech, it destroyed it. When your office is your living room, you are never truly “at work,” but you are also never truly “home.”

The “Bleed” Effect

Without a commute to bracket the day, work tends to bleed into the morning and late evening. The rise of global, distributed teams means meetings might happen at 7:00 AM or 9:00 PM.

Reclaiming the Commute

Quiet quitters in remote roles often artificially recreate a commute. They might go for a walk before logging on or change clothes at the end of the day. This signals to the brain that the “work” mode is disengaged.

The Right to Disconnect

Several regions, particularly in Europe, have enacted “Right to Disconnect” laws. While the US lags in legislation, many forward-thinking tech companies are adopting similar internal policies. Quiet quitting in this context is simply a personal enforcement of a right that should be universal.

The Manager’s Perspective: Leading in the Era of Boundaries

For managers, the rise of quiet quitting in tech presents a complex challenge. How do you drive innovation and meet aggressive product roadmaps if the team refuses to sprint?

Shift from Input to Output

The traditional management style of “butts in seats” (or green dots on Slack) is obsolete. Managers must learn to evaluate employees based on results.

New Metric: Did the feature ship on time? Is the code quality high?
Old Metric: Did they reply to my email within 5 minutes? Were they online at 6:00 PM?

Normalizing Boundaries

Leaders set the tone. If a manager sends emails at midnight, the team feels pressured to respond. Managers who want to prevent burnout must model quiet quitting behaviors themselves.

Best Practice: Schedule emails to send during working hours. Use status messages to indicate when you are offline.

The Danger of “Quiet Firing”

The flip side of quiet quitting is “quiet firing”—where managers neglect employees, deny them resources, or exclude them from opportunities in hopes that they will leave. This toxic cycle damages company reputation and morale. Constructive conversation regarding engagement is always superior to passive-aggressive neglect.

The Economic Context: Tech Layoffs and Stability

We cannot discuss quiet quitting without addressing the macroeconomic climate. The massive workforce reductions in the tech sector during the mid-2020s fundamentally altered the risk/reward calculus for employees.

The Survival Strategy

In an environment where entire departments can be eliminated overnight for stock performance reasons, overworking is an inefficient allocation of energy. Quiet quitting allows employees to conserve energy for:

Upskilling: Learning new languages or tools that make them employable elsewhere.
Side Hustles: Building income streams independent of their primary employer.
Networking: Maintaining connections outside the company silo.

Diversification of effort is a rational economic response to an unstable job market. By not giving 110% to a single employer, the worker hedges their bets.

Case Studies: What Quiet Quitting Looks Like in Practice

To illustrate the nuance of this trend, let’s look at a few anonymized composites of tech workers navigating these boundaries.

Case A: The Senior Engineer (“The Architect”)

Situation: Has 10+ years of experience. Formerly worked 60-hour weeks to get promoted.
Behavior: Now works strictly 9-to-5. Delivers high-quality code and mentors juniors but refuses to take on “glue work” (documentation, scheduling) that isn’t promotable.
Outcome: Remains a top performer on reviews because their core output is undeniable. They use their free time to contribute to open source, keeping their skills sharp for the next job.

Case B: The Product Manager (“The Burnout Survivor”)

Situation: Returned from medical leave due to stress-induced health issues.
Behavior: Disabled Slack on their phone. declined all meetings without a clear agenda. stopped responding to emails on weekends.
Outcome: Initially caused friction with leadership used to instant responses. Over time, the team adapted, and the PM found they made better decisions when not constantly reactive.

Case C: The Junior Developer (“The Transactionalist”)

Situation: Gen Z grad entering the workforce during layoffs.
Behavior: Treats the job purely as a paycheck. Does not socialize at happy hours. Clocks out immediately.
Outcome: struggles to find mentorship and political capital. While their boundaries are healthy, the lack of “soft” engagement slows their career progression compared to more visible peers.

Common Mistakes and Pitfalls

While establishing boundaries is positive, executing “quiet quitting” poorly can backfire.

1. Passive-Aggression

Stopping communication without explanation looks like unreliability. It is better to state, “I am offline for the evening to recharge,” than to simply vanish during a critical deployment.

2. Leaving Your Team in the Lurch

If your boundary setting means a colleague has to pick up your slack, you breed resentment. Quiet quitting should be about stopping extra work, not dumping core work on others.

3. Neglecting Visibility

If you reduce your hours, you must increase the visibility of your output. If you are both invisible and working less, you become an easy target for the next reduction in force (RIF).

Alternatives to Quiet Quitting: “Loud Quitting” and Renegotiation

Quiet quitting is passive. There are more active ways to address work dissatisfaction.

Loud Quitting

This involves actively voicing dissatisfaction, disrupting operations, and making it known that you are unhappy. This usually leads to termination but can sometimes force a company to address toxic issues.

Renegotiation (Job Crafting)

This is the mature evolution of quiet quitting. It involves sitting down with a manager and saying, “I want to stay here, but my current workload is unsustainable. Let’s look at my job description and cut the 20% of tasks that aren’t driving value.” This turns a passive withdrawal into a structural solution.

The Future of Work in Tech: Sustainable Pace vs. Hyper-Growth

The tech industry is at a crossroads. The era of “growth at all costs”—fueled by cheap capital and burnt-out humans—is fading. We are entering an era of efficiency and sustainability.

The “Sustainable Pace” Model

Agile methodology has long preached “sustainable pace”—the idea that a team should be able to maintain its velocity indefinitely. Quiet quitting is essentially the workforce demanding that companies actually adhere to this principle.

Future-forward companies are responding by:

Implementing 4-Day Workweeks: Compressing work to focus on output, forcing efficiency.
Async-First Cultures: Reducing meeting loads to allow for deep work.
Sabbatical Programs: Rewarding longevity with extended time off to prevent burnout.

Quiet quitting in tech is not a sign of a lazy generation; it is a market correction. It is the workforce signaling that the price of their labor does not include their mental health or their entire personal lives. As the industry matures, the companies that thrive will be those that respect these boundaries, turning “quiet quitters” into engaged, sustainable, and loyal employees.

Conclusion

The rise of quiet quitting in tech is a wake-up call for an industry that has long relied on the uncompensated passion of its workers. It represents a fundamental shift in how we view the relationship between employer and employee—moving from a family-style dedication to a balanced, professional transaction.

For employees, setting boundaries is essential for long-term survival in a high-pressure field. For employers, recognizing the difference between boundary-setting and disengagement is the key to retaining top talent. Ultimately, the goal shouldn’t be to get people to “quit” quietly or loudly, but to build a culture where they don’t feel the need to quit at all to reclaim their lives.

Next Steps: Review your current working hours and communication habits. Identify one specific boundary you can implement this week—whether it’s turning off notifications after 6 PM or declining a non-essential meeting—and communicate it clearly to your team.

FAQs

What is the difference between quiet quitting and just doing your job?

There is effectively no difference. The term “quiet quitting” was coined to sensationalize the act of fulfilling a job description without volunteering for unpaid, extra duties. In a healthy work culture, “just doing your job” is the standard, but in hustle-heavy industries like tech, it is often framed as a withdrawal of effort.

Can quiet quitting get me fired in the tech industry?

It is possible, but usually not for the act itself. If you are meeting all the deliverables outlined in your contract and performance goals, it is difficult to fire you for performance. However, in “at-will” employment states, you can be let go for “cultural fit” if leadership perceives your lack of extra enthusiasm as negative. Visibility of your core output is your best defense.

Is quiet quitting bad for my career growth?

It depends on your goals. If you are aiming for the C-suite or a rapid promotion to Principal Engineer, quiet quitting might slow you down, as those roles often require high visibility and political maneuvering beyond core tasks. However, if your goal is stability and longevity, quiet quitting can actually extend your career by preventing burnout.

How do I discuss workload with my manager without sounding like I’m quitting?

Focus on trade-offs and quality. Instead of saying “I won’t do this,” try saying, “To maintain the high quality of Codebase A, I need to deprioritize Task B. Does that align with our team goals?” This frames the boundary as a professional decision to protect the company’s product, rather than a personal refusal to work.

Is quiet quitting just a Gen Z trend?

While Gen Z popularized the term on social media, the behavior spans all generations. Older Millennials and Gen X workers in tech, often those with families or caretaking duties, have been practicing these boundaries for years. The difference is that younger generations are more vocal and unapologetic about refusing to prioritize work over life.

Does remote work make quiet quitting easier?

Yes. Without the physical visibility of the office (staying late at your desk), it is easier to set strict start and stop times. However, remote work also introduces “digital presenteeism,” where workers feel pressured to respond instantly to messages to prove they are working, which can be harder to manage than physical presence.

How can companies prevent quiet quitting?

Companies can prevent disengagement by calibrating workloads, offering fair compensation that matches inflation and market rates, and respecting time off. When employees feel that their extra effort is recognized and rewarded (financially or with career progression), they are less likely to withdraw into quiet quitting.

Is “acting your wage” the same as quiet quitting?

They are closely related. “Acting your wage” specifically ties effort to compensation. For example, a Junior Developer refusing to manage a team because that is a Senior Developer’s responsibility is “acting their wage.” It is a financial justification for the boundaries established by quiet quitting.

What is “loud quitting”?

Loud quitting is the opposite of quiet quitting. It involves an employee actively voicing their dissatisfaction, engaging in conflict, or dramatically reducing work in a way that forces a confrontation. While quiet quitting seeks to fly under the radar, loud quitting seeks to make a point or force a severance/termination event.

Will AI impact the quiet quitting trend?

AI may exacerbate the trend. As AI tools increase productivity, companies often respond by increasing quotas rather than reducing hours. This “hedonic treadmill” of productivity can lead to faster burnout, prompting more workers to quiet quit to protect their mental health against impossible algorithmic standards.

References

Gallup. (2024). State of the Global Workplace Report. Gallup Inc. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
Harvard Business Review. (2023). Quiet Quitting Is About Bad Bosses, Not Bad Employees. Harvard Business Publishing. https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees
Wired. (2025). The End of the Silicon Valley Hustle. Conde Nast. https://www.wired.com
McKinsey & Company. (2024). Employee Burnout: A Crisis in the Tech Sector. McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/employee-burnout
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Tech Sector Employment and Turnover Trends. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov
Deloitte. (2024). 2024 Global Human Capital Trends: Boundaryless World. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends.html
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2024). Navigating the New Psychological Contract. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org
World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025